In India, the conscience has complete freedom and confidence in democracy. If we forget the remnants of Chaturvanra for the country and start living as Indians, an all-encompassing ‘human state’ can be born in the constitution.
Conscientious Indianness that establishes the common worldly interests of all! Indianness is an uplifting laboratory for the human dignity of all and the complete opposite of all narrow and hostile notions. Indianness is universal and does not fit into any caste, religion or community. Her focus is on universal humanity and she is the complete opposite of putting anyone second. This Indianness means BC. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is rich, inclusive and meaningless from the 7,000 years of the Constitution of India. In this sense, I can say that I am Indian to any Indian, so I am also global. It is a matter of constant violation and is purely scientific.
The sophistication created for Indianness and socio-economic exploitation are contradictory. Indianness is a value system and ingenuity is a value system. They are completely contradictory. The struggle between these two camps is the history of India today. In the Chaturvanrya tradition, there is no freedom for civilization, equality, harmony, friendship or liberty. In this tradition, however, there is complete freedom from inequality, inferiority, discrimination, degradation and capitalism.
Chaturvanrya is the license for eternity, the power of diversity and exploitation! It is a structure formed for the domination of the Brahmin caste. Behind this is the false notion of karma vipakam. To this day, those who consider this design to be ideal find it very difficult to maintain. The caste system created in the Vedas thousands of years before AD began to impose itself on the original people here. Chaturvanra said the culture is eternal. But this eternity is not BC. It started a thousand years ago. The origin of the Chaturvanriya culture is clear so it is neither permanent nor permanent. This structure was created by humans, but no one suspected it was wrong. Chaturvanya first divided the society into four sections. These four divisions include millions of divisions in the form of castes and innumerable divisions of these divisions in the form of sub-castes. They are still enemies of unity.
Mehrgarh, Meluha and Indus cultures have been here for at least six and a half thousand years before the Vedas. In terms of value it is called the culture of labor. It is an Ihwadi, multi-ethnic, egalitarian and patriarchal culture. In this culture there were many groups like Bharat, Shiva, Riti. Conducts affairs with the consent of all. This republic or democracy is the foundation of democracy in our constitution.
This land got the name Bharat at that time. All these events are even older than the Vedas. No matter how old the universe is man has been the beginning of the universe since he began to think. As science says this period of decline, it is not permanent. The eternal shield is non-healing, but Indian culture is in the process of healing, up to Adisankhya, Lokayat, Buddha, Phule-Shahu-Ambedkar and the Constitution. Healing is the process of healing.
The word Indus was changed to Turkish due to a pronunciation problem. In the ninth century, it was called Hindu, but this change does not remove the value of the word ‘Indus’ from the word ‘Hindu’. The word shramana is derived from the word shramana which is derived from the word shramana. Many scholars, including Rajaramshastri Bhagavat, have suggested that the word Hindu originated in the tenth century. The name Hindu is also foreign. Muslims named the locals with the intention of showing their different identity. Babasaheb Ambedkar says in his book ‘Kula Nirmulana’ that it did not appear in any literary work before the Muslim invasion. That is, the word Hindu originated almost two thousand years after the Vedas and almost a thousand years after Manusmriti. The term BC Hindu was used by Pushyamitra Shungu and later Shankaracharya to inspire Indianness dating back to six to seven thousand years and to Buddhist India during the reigns of Emperors Ashoka and Brihadratha. Here the word Hindu has been misused to erase the original meaning of the word Hindu (Indus). It is an insult to the beautiful Indianness of the Republic, Ihwadi and equality. With the help of the irrational magic of imperfection and chastity, the business of perpetuating intrigue took place.
Chaturvanriya is an irrational notion that damages the reputation of humanity. There is complete freedom of conscience in Indianness. In fact the essence of Indianness is to think of this good conscience as life. Caste, caste is the only technique that divides the mind. Emotional and ideological unity and solidarity are nation building principles. A country with conflicting interests and riots will not happen. There is no such thing as a boss-friendly, hostile or hostile group. Friendship is the foundation for nation building. The concepts of humanity and nation are inseparable.
Chaturvanra’s bizarre invention cannot be called culture. People who consider master-servant relationships sacred and ideal cannot have civilization. There is no culture of walls of alienation, hatred and evil. Culture cannot be called the division of the rich and the poor. Culture is the almighty value that constantly discovers and enhances man and himself. Culture is the process of constantly making oneself and man innocent of oneself. It is not culture to embrace everyone for the sake of handfuls. Her deformity. It is inhumane to freeze one’s whole life in one place for the domination of a few. This type has lost the ability to call itself culture. In all such divisions virtually no society, nation or nation is formed. Culture is not enough for a system of human dignity, that is, a system of deliberate bankruptcy of human rights. Such a title is like telling the truth to a liar, lust for the wicked, politeness for the rude, love for hatred.
There are no characters in the culture of labor. There were gangs. He is a democrat. There is no economic or social exploitation. Consensus is the standard. The Buddha called the people living in this ganjivan ‘Arya’ which means Arya. These people considered the Buddha to be superior. Contrary to this Aryan concept, the Vedas call those who consider Chaturvanrya irreversible as ‘Arya’. Three thousand BC, a dispute broke out between the two Aryans. Ihwad and associates are one Aryan, while another Aryan is Chaturvanrya and Malaksevak. Babasaheb also observed these two Aryans.
What is the ideal to tell the world? Is it mutual enmity, a distortion of humanity or an Ihwadi Indianness that gives equality to all? Indians cannot accept the ideal of inhumane humanization and the beneficiaries of the quartet cannot accept the ideal of universal, secular Indianness.
No country is possible in a master-slave relationship. However, disaster on humanity is possible. Because the boss closes the relationship of justice, tolerance, democracy and harmony. Women (or tribals, or Razakars, or OBCs, or Muslims, or Jains, or Sikhs, or Buddhists) are not entitled to freedom. It’s ubiquitous clumsy. The Chaturvanrya tradition considers this nausea to be ideal. Therefore, the upper castes consider the working class culture and the independence gained in 1947 as their own independence. They see constitutional culture as an enemy to rebuild their heights of the dust of secular democracy and scientific humanism.
In this controversy B.C. For six-seven thousand years, the Republic of India has never given up the fat of the conscience of ‘people, for the people, from the people’. If even those who oppose this ‘Indian’ to this day now begin to live only as Indians, an all-encompassing ‘human state’ may be born in the Indian Constitution. Therefore, I think this is the answer to the question of how to reconcile and create the secular ‘Indian’ concept and also consider it as a panacea for all problems. The author is a Marathi poet and critic